From sfraves-request@medisg.Stanford.EDU Tue Apr 20 23:37:50 1993
Received: from medisg.Stanford.EDU by soda.berkeley.edu (5.65/KAOS-1)
	id AA09116; Tue, 20 Apr 93 23:36:34 -0700
Received: by medisg.Stanford.EDU (4.1/1.34)
	id AA10188; Tue, 20 Apr 93 22:29:32 PDT
Received: from sys1.unigate1.unisys.com by medisg.Stanford.EDU (4.1/1.34)
	id AA10181; Tue, 20 Apr 93 22:28:34 PDT
Received: from unislc.slc.unisys.com ([192.60.224.1]) by sys1.unigate1.unisys.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA24975; Wed, 21 Apr 93 05:26:16 GMT
Received: by unislc.slc.unisys.com (5.61/1.35)
	id AA06764; Tue, 20 Apr 93 23:28:11 -0600
From: brians@unislc.slc.unisys.com (Brian Sassone)
Message-Id: <9304210528.AA06764@unislc.slc.unisys.com>
Subject: Licensing
To: sfraves@medisg.Stanford.EDU (Bay Area Ravers)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 23:28:10 -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2489      
Status: OR


>From a leaflet published by The [British] Libertarian Alliance - Paul Staines:

	Imagine a regime so totalitarian that it will not allow its young
	citizens to dance when they want.  Imagine that this regime
	introduced a law which banned dance parties unless they were
	authorised by the state, and even then the parties would only be
	allowed to be of limited duration and on state-licensed premises.
	Naturally this regime would, in line with its ideology, only apply
	these laws to parties held for profit.

	The populist pro-government newspapers would of course launch a
	propagnada campaign against what it would call evil dance party
	organisers.  The pro-government press would conduct a hysterical
	smear campaign, describing the party organisers as criminals.

	In order to combat the subversive profiteering free market dance
	party entrepreneurs the state would form Lifestyle Police. ...

	This is truly a regime of which Stalin or Hilter himself would be
	proud, implementing socialist policies to protect the citizens from
	their own moral weakness. ...

	Sadly, the above is not fantasy, it is based on reality.  In Britian
	in 1990 all this happened ...

	... The Lifestyle Police are controlled by members of a powerful but
	little known clandestine entryist political party known as the
	Safety Nazis. ...

	The Safety Nazis want to ban things: video nasties, cigarettes,
	drink, drugs, loud music, pornography, toy guns, real guns,
	artificial additives, swear words on TV, fast cars, unusual sexual
	practices, dancing around Stonehenge on the solstice and Acid House
	parties.  They also make you do things for your own good, like wear
	a seat belt and watch public information films. ...

	Britian's archaic licensing laws demand that public entertainments
	such as nightclubs must be licensed, not just for fire and safety as
	one might reasonably expect Safety Nazis to demand, but also to
	serve drink, to play music and to allow dancing.  Why do you need a
	license?  Because the Safety Nazis want to make sure that you're
	safe! ...

	Civil liberties were crushed in order to stop young people from
	committing the heinous crime of dancing all night without a license.
	...


-----------------------===<<O>>===------------------------------------------
-bS							"A happy face,
brians@ios.convergent.com				 a funkin' bass,
A lowly raver without a glowstick.			 for a loving race."
------------------------------------------===<<O>>===-----------------------

